Fifa president Sepp Blatter has been a strong supporter of Russia's bid.
CEO Alexey Sorokin and chairman Vitaly Mutko (R) of Russia's bid committee for the FIFA soccer world cups 2018 and 2022 address a news conference in Zurich November 30, 2010.
Photo: Reuters
Fifa's executive committee voted in a secret ballot on December 2 to award the 2018 World Cup to Russia, dashing the hopes of rival bids put forth by England, Spain and Portugal, Belgium and The Netherlands.
It was not immediately clear how many rounds of voting it took to designate the winner, but the final announcement was delayed with about half an hour beyond the initial forecasts, suggesting a close race.
British media suggested that England was the first bidder eliminated, with BBC reporting that Russia took only two rounds of voting to reach the necessary majority of votes from the 22-member Fifa executive committee. Fifa said that it would make the details of the votes available to the public later.
Russia won the 2018 race despite the last-minute withdrawal of Russian prime minister Vladimir Putin, credited with winning the 2014 winter Olympics for Sochi, who did not travel to Zurich for the final presentation and the announcement. Putin's place was taken by his deputy Igor Shuvalov.
"We have had four bidders for 2018 and we can have only one winner. Three of the bidding associations must go home saying 'what a pity'. But they must say football is not only by winning but football is also a school of life where you learn to lose. That's not easy," Fifa president Sepp Blatter told the audience prior to the announcement.
The 2022 World Cup was awarded to Qatar, which will be the first Middle Eastern country to host the biggest football tournament in the world, defeating competition from the US, Australia, Japan, South Korea.
Neither Russia, nor Qatar have hosted the tournament before, although Moscow has hosted summer Olympic Games in 1980 and Sochi will host the winter Olympics in 2014.
The bidders for the 2018 World made their final presentations at Fifa's snow-covered headquarters in Zurich earlier in the morning, a day after the 2022 World Cup bidders did the same.
The joint bid by The Netherlands and Belgium – neither country has hosted the World Cup, but the two countries staged the 2000 European championship together – called on a host of great former players to emphasise the wealth of tradition that the bid would deliver, with Ruud Gullit and Johan Cruyff representing The Netherlands and Jean-Marie Pfaff speaking for Belgium. However, the Dutch government's unwillingness to extend wide-reaching powers to Fifa for the duration of the tournament had made the bid an outsider from the very start.
Spain and Portugal have each hosted major tournaments in the past (the 1982 World Cup and the 1964 European championship for Spain and the 2004 European championship in Portugal's case) but teamed up to bid to host the 2018 World Cup. Teir bid was bolstered by the Spanish national team's success at the 2010 World Cup in South Africa, which won the tournament against rival bidder The Netherlands in the final, but the focus of the two countries' presentation was on their tourist appeal and the ample accomodations that could be offered to visiting fans.
England's presentation, which many fans feared was hamstrung by the Fifa corruption revelations in UK press, tried to press the success of its Premier League, the passion of its fans, the top-class facilities, as well as guaranteeing the event would be a commercial success. Furthermore, the bid committed to match Fifa's spending on football as a social development tool around the world.
Russia's bid presentation also promised to deliver new top-notch facilities and infrastructure in time for 2018 and was the only bidding country to feature a woman as part of its presentation, Olympic champion Yelena Isinbaeva.
In the end, it was the promise of tapping new markets that won out. "For 2018 and 2022, we go to new lands, because the Fifa World Cup has never been in eastern Europe or the Middle East," Blatter said after the announcements.
[Dean] "It's not about developing countries. It's not a charity organisation!"
This is a football competition for the world. It's about fair chances and equality of participation, organization and development of soocer sport [infrastructure and the game] regardless the location. Having excellent soccer infrastructure should not be grant for the justification of choice to host the WC. The emphasis on the balanced development of soccer sport of world should be the prime consideration, so that all continents will be having competititve national soccer teams in future, and the competion will be competing fairly and interesting regardless [...]
Read the full commentat the cold or hot countries in the world as well as limiting the accusation of FIFA being unfair and corrupted. WELL DONE FIFA !
D-Man - It's not about developing countries. It's not a charity organisation! This is a football competition for the fans. How are the fans served by having this competition in Russia and especially Qatar, a country with absolutely no history in football. An absolute farce and clearly the result of total corruption - there is no other explanation. The whole competition is now devalued and the members of FIFA a laughing stock.
FIFA are a complete joke & very corrupt as has been continually proved. The voting should be on which Country comes tops in all the evaluations, in which case we all were made aware that was England. In addition the presentation today by them was top class and way ahead of the competition
As for QATAR - words fail all of us
One thing is for sure the men on FIFA are no doubt much richer after this and the likes of Abramovich probably poorer in funds paid out - that's why he sacked [...]
D-man. You don't think that the tens of millions of Dollars into some judges private offshore bank accounts had anything to do with it. It is now public that the voting system is rife with corruption and bribes. Match that with Russia who survives on corruption and bribes and they are perfectly matched. The only thing the other countries did wrong was not to offer bribes. I have done business in Russia, Nigeria and most of the Middle East and the basic rule of thumb is if you want business you have to bribe. If you choose not to because [...]
Read the full commentyou have principals then you will not do business in these countries.
it's a good thing that Russia won the bid, because the country needs to grow as a footballing nation and away from the politics, yes i agree that England had a good bid, but i feel that they have more infrastructure than all the countries, furthermore England are well above the rest with development thus russia needs to be developed just like South Africa
The decision by the world's football governing body to award the 2018 and 2022 World Cup tournaments to Russia and Qatar, respectively, sparked immediate reaction from winners and losers both.
Football governing body Fifa decided on December 2 2010 to award the hosting of the 2022 World Cup to Qatar, Fifa president Sepp Blatter announced in Zurich.
Co-operation and synergy between the police, sports organisations, regulatory agencies and the community in general is vital if we want to prevent sport from losing its true meaning and value, Ronald Noble said.
For the past two years, BFU has been exploring the possibility of making a joint bid with Romania, winning the support of Prime Minister Boiko Borissov.
[Dean] "It's not about developing countries. It's not a charity organisation!"
This is a football competition for the world. It's about fair chances and equality of participation, organization and development of soocer sport [infrastructure and the game] regardless the location. Having excellent soccer infrastructure should not be grant for the justification of choice to host the WC. The emphasis on the balanced development of soccer sport of world should be the prime consideration, so that all continents will be having competititve national soccer teams in future, and the competion will be competing fairly and interesting regardless [...]
Read the full comment at the cold or hot countries in the world as well as limiting the accusation of FIFA being unfair and corrupted. WELL DONE FIFA !
D-Man - It's not about developing countries. It's not a charity organisation! This is a football competition for the fans. How are the fans served by having this competition in Russia and especially Qatar, a country with absolutely no history in football. An absolute farce and clearly the result of total corruption - there is no other explanation. The whole competition is now devalued and the members of FIFA a laughing stock.
If you choose not to because you have principals
or if you can't spell...
Congratulation to Russia and Qatar.
"The New Perspective and Passion for Future Soccer World Cup Excitement"
What did England expect with a presentation by an inbred Royal parasite?
Fifa opened new Era in world cup history by introducing new organizer,
2022 ballot:
First round
Qatar 11
South Korea 4
Japan 3
U.S. 3
Australia 1 (eliminated)
Second round
Qatar 10
South Korea 5
U.S. 5
Japan 2 (eliminated)
Third round
Qatar 11
U.S. 6
South Korea 5 (eliminated)
[...]
Read the full comment
Fourth round
Qatar 14
U.S. 8
2018 ballot
First round:
Russia 9
Spain/Portugal 7
Netherlands/Belgium 4
England 2 (eliminated)
Second round:
Russia 13
Spain/Portugal 7
Netherlands/Belgium 2
Corruption is alive and well in FIFA!
FIFA are a complete joke & very corrupt as has been continually proved. The voting should be on which Country comes tops in all the evaluations, in which case we all were made aware that was England. In addition the presentation today by them was top class and way ahead of the competition
As for QATAR - words fail all of us
One thing is for sure the men on FIFA are no doubt much richer after this and the likes of Abramovich probably poorer in funds paid out - that's why he sacked [...]
Read the full comment Ray Wilkins, the funds had to be spent elsewhere!!
D-man. You don't think that the tens of millions of Dollars into some judges private offshore bank accounts had anything to do with it. It is now public that the voting system is rife with corruption and bribes. Match that with Russia who survives on corruption and bribes and they are perfectly matched. The only thing the other countries did wrong was not to offer bribes. I have done business in Russia, Nigeria and most of the Middle East and the basic rule of thumb is if you want business you have to bribe. If you choose not to because [...]
Read the full comment you have principals then you will not do business in these countries.
it's a good thing that Russia won the bid, because the country needs to grow as a footballing nation and away from the politics, yes i agree that England had a good bid, but i feel that they have more infrastructure than all the countries, furthermore England are well above the rest with development thus russia needs to be developed just like South Africa